When designing a building the intended use of the building should be taken into account rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is stated that while architecting a building emphasis ought to be on its purpose instead of the outer look. In my opinion, affordability and security should be given prime attention while sketching the design of a building; however, at the tourist destinations, more stress should be on its facade.
Firstly, buildings should be designed in a way so that people can afford them. In other words, making a place more appealing from outside entails the use of glass and other decorative materials that are often expensive, resulting in burgeoning the property price; consequently, it becomes arduous for people to purchase or rent them. For instance, a survey conducted by an accommodation agency in Chandigarh, Punjab, reveals that the sale of affordable houses in this city is 70% more compared to attractive looking ones, which are priced exorbitantly.
Secondly, buildings ought to be safe and Secure for the occupants. To illustrate, these should be capable to withstand the natural calamities, such as floods, earthquakes and Hurricanes, so that people can be protected during the various life-threatening situation. Therefore, architects should opt for robust materials while designing the buildings. Moreover, entrance and exit of buildings should be given proper attention for enabling quick eviction during emergencies such as fire.
However, at the tourist places emphasis should be on making buildings more alluring from outside because it helps these cities to attract more travellers which further provides a boost to the local tourism industry.
To conclude, I believe that building should be planned for providing safety and cost-effectiveness to the occupants, but at tourist attractions, their facade should be made more alluring.
- Nowadays, many children eat food that is not good for health. Why is this happening? what should be done for this? 89
- Some people use Technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. what are the reasons behind this phenomenon? is this a positive or negative development according to you? 78
- Some people believe that robots are important for humans to develop their future while others think that it is a dangerous invention dangerous invention that will impact society negatively Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Governments give lots of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been spent better elsewhere Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
- When designing a building the intended use of the building should be taken into account rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while designing the buildings. Moreover, entrance and exit of buildings should be...
^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
...uch as fire. However, at the tourist places emphasis should be on making buildings ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52222222222 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08108304048 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3058306174 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1818181818 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207014030359 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098185029041 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533109121438 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129490923427 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415360985349 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.