'Schools should prepare students for universities, rather than for work.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

Essay topics:

'Schools should prepare students for universities, rather than for work.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

Recently, the phenomenon of main objective of schools and universities in education system has sparked the debate. While some people argue that schools must prepare students for universities, others simply despise it. In this essay, I will discuss the core functions of schools and universities in student life and will prove that why schools must prepare students for universities.

In our education system, schools are the first institutions where students go for education. The main objective of sending students to school is to access student’s interests, strengths and weaknesses, so that its future career can be selected. For example when I started education, my family sent me to school where I received my basic education and as per my interest in mathematics, I selected Engineering field. So school should access student’s interests and prepare them for respective field.

On the other hand, the purpose of universities must be enhancing student’s abilities in his favorite field by theories and practical knowledge. It will help him to master in his field and be prepared for work. In my case, when I started my education in engineering university I learned a lot of technical subjects which helped me a lot throughout my professional career. So we can say that universities can prepare their students well for work.

After analyzing main objectives of schools and colleges we can strongly argue that schools must prepare students for universities and not for professional life.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-11-12 Krishn Patel 85 view
2018-11-12 Krishn Patel 80 view
2018-10-18 minapolo 80 view
2018-10-18 minapolo 80 view
2018-10-18 minapolo 85 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsities and not for professional life.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38235294118 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1338257194 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53781512605 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6012521955 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231360524687 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109202468698 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619965781345 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162114625266 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303756859003 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.