The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The diagram illustrates the rate how many British citizens donate to charity by age groups between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, there was a general decrease in the percentage of people who gave money in the age before 50 from 1990 to 2010. Nevertheless, It was a slight increase in the age after 50.
The highest decline was in the age range 18-25, which went down significantly from around 18% in 1990 to under 7% in 2010. The next category is 26-35, it also was a remarkable decrease from over 30% in 1990 to under 25% in 2010. In 1990, the age group 36-50 had a majority of people gave money to charity, which was nearly 43%, while the rate in 2010 was 35%.
The exception of this general downtrend was in two age groups 51-65 and over 65s. In 2010, the age group 51-65 gave the highest percentage with approximately 40% and 35% in 1990. Finally, the age over 65s rose minimally by about 3% from 32% in 1990 to 35% in 2010.
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Towhat extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day on one year 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 67
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38728323699 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35506397059 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7244244408 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245433161528 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122119913714 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605377406691 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170825642209 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192435416445 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.