Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the advantages and disadvantages of video calls among doctors and patients to diagnose a disease. Some people think that video calling can act as a benefitial tool between doctors and patients, while others maintain that a disease cannot be accurately diagnosed via video calls. This essay will discuss the disadvantages of video calling in medical domain to cure a disease.
At the outset, there are myriad of negative arguments associated with use of video call between doctors and patients. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the right diagnosis of the disease. Medicine is a profession which not only entails direct interaction between doctor and patient but also requires close visual physical inspection of the disease or wound. For instance, a dermatologist cannot write his opinion about a skin disease until physical examined and checked. As a result, it is quite evident that diseases cannot be accurately diagnosed on video communication.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that doctors need to inspect other vitals to precisely know about the disease. Therefore, doctors are unable to check up of other vitals that require specialized medical apparatus, for example, a stethoscope or BP machine to inspect the chest congestion or blood pressure. As a matter of fact, for accurate and timely medical diagnoses and cure, a patient needs to be tested via allied equipment which cannot be done on a video call.
To recapitulate, aforementioned discussion propounds that video calling between doctors and patients has more disadvantagess than advantages as physical inspection and checkup by ancillary equipment cannot be carried out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- It has recently been suggested that the classical or dead languages Latin and Greek should be re introduced into the school curriculum Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job Those i 89
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years In your opinion what are the positive and negative impacts of this change 70
- schools should prepare students for universities rather than work. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons / or examples from your experience or observations. 80
- As a result of advances in medical care, life expectancy is increasing for both men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? what are the disadvantages of the ageing population for individuals and the society? Support y 77
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ately diagnosed on video communication. On the other hand, another pivotal facet...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41090909091 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92286285561 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570909090909 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8218457697 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200831347031 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806559449515 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412293705145 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131673149776 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038626747807 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.