Some universities deduct students’ work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions?
Recently, the phenomenon of eliminating the pupils's scores due to having delay to submit their assignments has sparked a heated debate. Although this idea is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial numbers of individuls both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it cannot be plus as it could develop some catastrophic impacts on the youths.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why punishing students by omitting their grades after submitting their assignments by delay is disadvantageous. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these drawbacks. Firstly, not only this type of punishment creates stress among pupils, but also it leads to creating a sense of disliking. Faculties or tutors should utilize some encouragement schemes to motive them to do their best. For instance, they can introduce the pupils who did their assignment on-time as the prosperous ones instead of using the punishment style. Furthermore, they should find out the reason of the delay and address their roots including enhancing concentration and interest which lead to developing productivity and effectiveness.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of using the potential of reducing scores due to being late to submit the assignments has some advocates. These people asserted that the youths should have the sense of fear about the consequences of giving their homeworks late. They argue that deducting scores have the ability to affect the competition sense among them and it has the ample power to guide and encourage the students.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the demerits of giving low scores to students who have delay to submit their assignments is far more outweigh its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-29 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- The only thing that interferes my learning is my education. (Albert Einstein). Discuss this statement. 11
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 79
- Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extentdo you agree with this statement? 11
- Parents are responsible for the behaviour of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97298204203 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3113551037 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12583946914 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044908729796 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367425436095 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756776371994 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235036732174 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.