Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons andexamples from your own experience.

Recently, the phenomenon of classifying some type of employment suitable for women or men, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that separating the jobs cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that this sorting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree that the jobs should be classified for males and females. At first, the jobs should be appropriate for the gender, which occupied on it. The hard works are not suitable for women due to their delicate body systems. For example. The jobs like welding and mining need to muscular power that being in men's body.
In addition, the men are not able to work in the jobs that need to sprit and delicacy. The men do hard works and the women do delicate things such as nursing and the teachers of kindergarten. For instance, a recent research conducted by MTV University researchers in 2014 has shown that a significant number of women tend to work in careers like a primary school teacher is related to their moral ability.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of separating jobs for two genders far outweighed its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of classifying ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uscular power that being in mens body. In addition, the men are not able to wor...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her is related to their moral ability. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95299145299 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82522592491 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5167532864 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208668880983 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814161050918 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608029977387 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116418796407 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390494257966 0.0609392437508 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.