Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that people, who are running for their lives from their own nations, must be welcomed by affluent nations, and basic amaneties must be provided to them. This essay agrees to the aforementioned statement because it is their moral covanent and rich countries can afford some extra stress on their nation's economy.
Primary reason is that humanitarian grounds can be used by developed nations, if someone seeks the refuge to the particular country. People are leaving their countries as massive war has broken into their states, so asylum must be granted to children and to their mothers. Because every men and women are equal, everyone has equal rights on the rudimentary amaneties of the world, and they must not left alone in the war zone to die. For example, Germany has provided asylum to the approximately 5 million Syrian refugees since the day war has started in Syria.
Furthermore, rich nations have enough resources which can be utilized by asylum seekers. Developed nations have food, shelter and proper education system with job vacancies, and can be harnessed by refugees. Moreover, requirement of labour by states can be fulfilled by people, who are desperate in the need of asylum. To exemplify this, 5% of Germany's labour jobs are occupied by Syrians that are helping the state's economy to boost.
In conclusion, this essay has agreed that affluent states in the world must step forward and open their doors for refuge seeker because immigrants as a refugees are fruitful for the states, which are providing accommodations to dwellers in the favour of humanity and there will be less strain on the gross domestic product.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | Nyasha | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Renu_art | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | anoj adhikari | 33 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | Lien Huynh | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | NeutronnzZ | 78 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past.Do you think this is a positive or negative development. 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur by states can be fulfilled by people, who are desperate in the need of asylum....
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...ccupied by Syrians that are helping the states economy to boost. In conclusion, thi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a refugee' or simply 'refugees'?
Suggestion: a refugee; refugees
...for refuge seeker because immigrants as a refugees are fruitful for the states, which are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05109489051 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60122472661 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569343065693 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4582984637 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.818181818 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0787035732932 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297503520418 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292059418136 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514118222328 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202896939318 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur by states can be fulfilled by people, who are desperate in the need of asylum....
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...ccupied by Syrians that are helping the states economy to boost. In conclusion, thi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a refugee' or simply 'refugees'?
Suggestion: a refugee; refugees
...for refuge seeker because immigrants as a refugees are fruitful for the states, which are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05109489051 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60122472661 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569343065693 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4582984637 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.818181818 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0787035732932 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297503520418 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292059418136 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514118222328 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202896939318 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.