TPO 52
The passage proposes that astroids can be utilized for colonization purposes and it suggests some reasons to support its claim. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that this idea is not very practical and he further brings up some counter claims to refute all of the rationales that are proposed by the passage.
First, the passage discusses that the low gravity of astroids can be manipulated to make the processes of landing and taking-off easier and softer. The auther further mentions that by this mean, space crafts can carry much more equipments and less fuel. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the fact that low gravity condition can cause serious problems to astronauts such as losing muscle and bone density. he then brings up the example of the problems that happend for astronauts in short-term low-gravity condition and mentions that these problems will be much more severe in long-term colonization of astroids.
Second, the auther suggests that some astroids are rich in valuable minerals such as gold and platinum which can be braught back to earth to compensate the high costs of this space trip. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by highlighting the enourmous costs of transportation of these minerals back to earth. Additionally, he mentions that by bringing these minerals, their supply will be increased and as a consequence, their price will be lowered.
Finally, the passage underlines the idea that astroids are easy to reach and therefore, it is more easier and affordable to get to and get back from them. The lecturer in contrary, mentions that astroids usually do not have an usual orbiting pattern. He further discusses that maybe astroids get close enough to earth for landing on them but they might get far away from earth, even farther than Mars, and this incident will make the process of coming back from them difficult.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | AT2G38040 | 85 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | lutzuming | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...brings up some counter claims to refute all of the rationales that are proposed by the pas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...such as losing muscle and bone density. he then brings up the example of the probl...
^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... are easy to reach and therefore, it is more easier and affordable to get to and get back f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tions that astroids usually do not have an usual orbiting pattern. He further disc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, in contrast, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04487179487 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62750928875 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8656249857 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.