It is better for children to work with others as a team than to work on their on
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus there is an increasing number of parents or individuals attaching more importance to the education of children. Some individuals contend that comparing to working on their own, it is an optimal option for children to work with others as a team. Personally speaking, I concur with the listed opinion and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, working with others sharpen children’s skills in communication. To be more specific, initially, it is widely acknowledged that in a group project, at the aim of maximizing different components’ function in cooperation, different individuals need to communicate with each other to ensure their function. Meanwhile, during the process of prompting the group project, diversified problems are likely to emerge. Therefore, group members are required to utilize their separate knowledge to make concerted efforts to solve it or overcome any obstacles confronted with them. Therefore, children in a group project, at the aim of achieving their common goals, they ought to communicate with each other, which definitely enables them to consider the optimal and efficient approaches to convey their thoughts to other members through practice. The research conducted to evaluate people’s willingness to cooperate with others demonstrates that there is a propensity that 78% individuals have preference for collaborating with others with experience in group cooperation, since that reckon that such individuals are likely to have better aptitude in communication. This research illuminates that communication skills can really be significantly enhanced in group project.
What’s more, cooperation with others also renders children with sense of achievement, thus reinforces their self-confidence. Concretely, due to individuals’ limit in personal abilities and energy, it is impossible to achieve a goal successfully without any efforts from others, therefore if children are required to fulfill their tasks all by themselves, they are likely be immersed with the sense of frustration, which exerts detrimental effects on their growth by dampening their enthusiasm. On the contrary, working with others enables them to seek helps from others, which means that they can learn from others’ advantages to offset their weaknesses so as to enhance the group’s final outcomes. In addition, since the task in a group project is usually distributed to each individual, what children ought to do is diminished, therefore it is more easy for children to fulfill their tasks in a shortened time, which renders them the feeling of accomplishment. Another research also verifies the mentioned view. In this research, a bunch of children are tested in a long run, those children who had previous experience related with cooperation tend to finish varieties of tasks not only in a high quality but also in shorter time, since they are proficient in gaining help from others and manage the whole process by subdivision and cooperation, which indicates that collaboration constitutes a stepping stone in elevating children’s aptitudes.
Admittedly, working on their own also has its own perks, for instance, they can be trained to cultivate their all round aptitudes by tackling each issue with their own efforts, Nevertheless, taking individuals’ limit in their strengths into consideration, not each child is capable of handling such situation, some of them probably freak out under the insurmountable pressure generated from the project, which prevents them from further developing them specific capabilities.
In a nutshell, owing to the improvement in communication skills and the sense of achievement rendered by group project, it is a preferred choice for us to make children to coordinate with others.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-11 | meet96300 | 90 | view |
2023-06-12 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
2023-06-04 | nph | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together. 73
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- Imagine you need to improve your performance in order to get better grades or higher work payment which way would you choose 1 doing more extra work or assignments that are required 2 participate more actively or contributing your own idea more frequently 87
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...; advantages to offset their weaknesses so as to enhance the group's final outcomes...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in short, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 110.0 52.1666666667 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3298.0 1977.66487455 167% => OK
No of words: 584.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64726027397 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31909744699 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503424657534 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1012.5 618.680645161 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.702828631 48.9658058833 247% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 183.222222222 100.406767564 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4444444444 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381362702691 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138117432941 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128046527508 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224656220503 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773571641023 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 11.7677419355 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 175.0 86.8835125448 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.