Internet or media is bad for young people they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships. Do you agree with this opinion? please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea.
Recently, the effects of the internet and media have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " Are they weaken young generation's communication skills?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that forming relationships is beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the telecommunication standpoint, media is bound up inextricably with unavoidable influences, which indicates they lead to both news and information sharing. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted in 2013 demonstrates the relationship between TV shows and sitcoms as well as an exponential increase in depression. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the intention that the likelihood of the internet is correlated positively with not only poor communications but also virtual friendships.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, young generations attribute to antisocial behaviors, in that it would come down to social conducts, anxiety, and stress. A salient example of such attribution is social software, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take cyber connections for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint the privacy invasion problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to self-confidence, misleading advertisements, and even real communications. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of the internet and media in training social developments
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that media and internet affect the relationships and communications. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | dineshshinde98 | 88 | view |
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- How do you think that the design of building has impacts, either positively or negatively, on where people live and work? 85
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- The cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. How realistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 77
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – thatwe should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...t question ' Are they weaken young generations communication skills?'. Whereas, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...enerations communication skills?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that forming ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8085106383 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46178487625 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1318096146 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182823458621 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490553495354 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431142710003 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998106507171 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296817003101 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.