A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The structure of a school national system is influenced by a wide list of factors. While governments try to find the best set for their schools, it is interesting to consider a hypotetical policy that requires students to study all the same national curriculum before college. As it is unobjectable, though, there are many reasons not to consider this policy a lawless one.
To begin with, a consistent issue that has to be addressed is the specific definition of the curriculum. It is clearly evident, in fact, that to expect all the students to follow a single general path in their studies it is necessary to adopt a number of criteria to determin the perfect and universal curriculum. For instance, what are the subjects that can most of all improve students' success in their future careers? What are those that ar mandatory to build up a fundamental code of morals as to furnish the nation with decent citizens? It is unavoidable to maintain that this specific necessity consitutes an crucial occurrence that has to considered. If the nation is able to set a clear method to study the best possible curriculum, only then it is to be deemed correct to guide students through a globally common study plan.
Nevertheless, this hypotetical method has to deal with a number of personal idiosyncrasies. An effective example of this is the Italian school system, world-wide celebrated as one of the more thourough. Its main and pivotal feature is the possibility given to Italian students to choose their study career among a wide variety of topics and levels. This results in a greater enthusiasm reguarding school subjects and, eventually, a higher cutural levels that directly comes from the more substantial effort that students put in their chosen studies. This is, without a doubt, a reasonable consequence of the continuity between people's interests and virtues and school paths. What is more, a compelling evidence of this mechanism is given by the data collected about students that cannot achieve their final diploma: most of them considered the subject they had to study as boring and useless, just in a specularly opposite way of the excitement demonstrated by the best students of the same schools. Hence, the main circumnstance that should be analized is the range of interests and virtues of the students of the a nation. If, for any reason, the areas of interests are not so dramatically different, then it is probably cunning to adopt such an education policy.
An other point that can be crucial to determine whether or not to find advantagious the stated policy is the effectiveness of some curricula differently from others. Having a superficial look at graphs and reports, it could be sentenced, for example, that scientific paths have a really greater impact in the burgeoning of a nation economy. In fact, colleges that specialize in engineering, chemistry, physiscs and maths are, generally speaking, more productive than others (as highlighted by a plethora of recent social and economical surveys). Notwithstanding the foregoing, it winds up to be strictly wrong to deduce that everyone should follow a scientific curriculum before univerisity. Indeed, an ever-increasing amount of young students find their way to success through humanistic and historical studies, and, as a matter of fact, the best percentile of the managing upper-class is constituted by people that decided to study curricula that had nothing to do with what they chose in colleges.
As shown, it is not always correct to adopt a single unique s
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 66
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. 70
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...that this specific necessity consitutes an crucial occurrence that has to consider...
^^
Line 5, column 1112, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...nterests and virtues of the students of the a nation. If, for any reason, the areas o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: Another
...g to adopt such an education policy. An other point that can be crucial to determine ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... point that can be crucial to determine whether or not to find advantagious the stated policy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, all the same, as a matter of fact, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2968.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 583.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99073807587 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502572898799 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 943.2 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3147388494 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.043478261 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.347826087 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272191912956 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680719595662 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805906510682 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14375359423 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947152115962 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.