In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes and computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why?

Essay topics:

In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes and computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why?

Recently, the phenomenon of different inventions and its corresponding impact has started a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of aerospace inventions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe the benefits of computer technologies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, the invention of computers can provide the society some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of computer technologies, as well as a pioneer invention, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between the leading technological advances and computer science. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both scientific mainframes and the exceeding number of computer industry leaders apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the invention of aircraft might increase the consequences of the shipping invention. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the spaceship technology would be related to this reality that the demerits of commercial aircraft, pertain to the airplane industry. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of an expensive invention is correlated negatively with medical versus aerospace technologies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the fighter aircraft.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of multiple technological inventions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of airplanes proves the significance of laptops, but also pinpoint technical implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-03 neethujithin 70 view
2019-06-03 neethujithin 75 view
2019-05-17 nbhardwaj1981 80 view
2019-02-23 VanithaE 68 view
2019-02-23 VanithaE 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user daniel.bakhshe… :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7761732852 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32874303268 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1383035617 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821785753665 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291501532793 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279229885457 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515752425654 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024493406851 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.