Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poor nations. Rich countries should pay more attention.
I totally agree with this statement, only heavy investment in health, education and in good environment for business can take some country from poverty to development. I would argue that all other way took by a few countries didn’t work as good as these thee foundations above.
It is easy to find good examples of countries that crossed the line of third world to reach the richness after raising sharply their support for trade and business. Truly, I would say that this is the most significant factor that makes some country part of the first world. If people around the world see your country as trustable and reliable, they will begin to bring investment to it. For instance, China and Emirates are two regions pretty much successful in these ideas. They have been attracting a huge amount of investment lately because these factors above.
Otherwise, investing in healthcare and basic education for the populations not going to make your country rich in the first moment, however, these areas well treated will bring dignity and other non financial benefits. These things are tremendously relevant for quality of life of the people and a high level of it is one of the most important features of first world countries. Nations such as Canada or Australia have been spent billions of dollars in their public services especially health and education and this have been making them the most admired places worldwide.
Also, I would say that most of the countries already among richest in the world have the responsibility to help and guide other countries. USA and United Kingdom are probably most respected leaders in the international community and they should help non wealthy countries to take the way to reach development, they surely have to pay attention to them, because, if some country grows, everyone will gain.
Therefore, these three aspects are extremely important for a society well care, and all countries should invest and put their efforts to reach a high level of them. So, only by this, bring dignity and prosperity for the population will be really possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-24 | Yuri Manata | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-24 | Yuri Manata | 67 | view |
| 2016-07-20 | sajitha | 61 | view |
| 2016-07-20 | sajitha | 56 | view |
- Some young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off from school. Which of thefollowing activities would be most beneficial for young people (ages 14-18) to do in their spare time?Why?- Gaining practical work experience either at a 56
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poor nations. Rich countries should pay more attention. 67
- some people think that universities should provide with konwledge and skills needed in the workplace .Others think taht the true function of a universityshould be to give access to knowladge for its own sake ,regardless of whether the course is usefull to 73
- The mark of a successful person is to be wealthy and have a successful career To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant exa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...of the people and a high level of it is one of the most important features of first wo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, third, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03448275862 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59639118634 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548850574713 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.952158433 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179862642523 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625544043537 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408451788157 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105035353921 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00882702972473 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.