The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012.
The given line graph compares the percentage of young unemployment who living in England during the period from 1993 to 2012.
It is clear that the total number of four groups in England rose significantly, while the figures for the aged 16-24 London and aged 16-24 rest of England increased higher than the overall London and Overall rest of England. Also, the number of aged 16-24 London was the highest and the lowest was the overall rest of England during the period.
In 1993, the percentage of aged 16-24 London stood at 22% higher than aged 16-24 rest of England by 5%. This number declined gradually to approximately 15% and 11% of the aged 16-24 London and aged 16-24 rest of England respectively until 2002 before that the rate recovered jumping back up to 25% of the aged 16-24 London which was higher than the aged 16-24 rest of England by 5% in 2012.
According to the graph, at 14% of the overall London was higher than the overall rest of England by 4% in 1993. The percentage of both two groups decreased moderately until 2005. After that, the number of overall London and the overall rest of England rose dramatically to approximately 9% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Tri H. Ho | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | To Rang | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | Phung Quang Tuan | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | Khanh Ha | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | manpreet kaurs | 78 | view |
- Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now Do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The chart below shows International migration in UK. 78
- The table below shows the percentage of students giving good rating for different aspects of a university in China in 2000, 2005, 2010. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 61
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67475728155 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40720417005 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412621359223 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0338840211 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145219545328 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932669777966 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822562411474 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136620457344 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091324520166 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.