The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The graph depicts the percentage of American residents eating frequently in junk food restaurant during10 years. Overall, it is clear that the figures for once or twice a month and a few times a year experienced an increase, while those for other frequencies a decrease.
Looking in details, there was a growth of once or twice a month figure, rising slightly from around 30% in 2003 to about 33% in 2013--the maximum number in this statistical data. Likewise, a few time a year percentage presented a gradual increase to roughly 15% in 2006 before leveling off at the end of the timeline.
However, the percentage of several times a week and that of once a week had a similar pattern. The former climbed to nearly 20% in 2006, and afterwards suffered from a noticeable fall to approximately 16% in 2013. Also, the latter rose to roughly 33%, and then declined to 27% in 2013. At the same time, the timeline witnessed a moderate drop in the proportion of people eating every day and never in a fast food restaurant in 2006 before remaining stable at around 3% --the smallest percentage during the 10 years.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 73
- The diagram below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- Some people think the most important thing about being rich is helping other people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...r in this statistical data. Likewise, a few time a year percentage presented a gradual i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '--the the smallest'.
Suggestion: --the the smallest
...06 before remaining stable at around 3% --the smallest percentage during the 10 years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, likewise, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74742268041 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71977930903 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0861909162 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122300923836 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490114879903 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479770000934 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770732175515 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260145728272 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.