Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that these days, online libraries play such an important role in modern life. While others are in favour of this view, I think that It is also necessary for us to remain traditional libraries.
On the one hand, it is obvious that libraries on the website are good place to encourage people to use. The first reason for this is that the online library is a limitless source of material for reading and even easy to keep up to date of news all around the World by only one click. For example, if students have an online account, they can download many books in terms of their major majors. Another reason for this without wasting time on travelling to traditional libraries, people can use a smartphone or laptop to read something or look for information anywhere in which whenever the internet connected.
On the other hand, we cannot deny that remaining public libraries there are many bring benefits of health, especially with eyes. This means that reading on paper avoids the effect of green light which lead to disease’s eyes. Secondly, traditional libraries are wonderful areas for people. Studying and making new friends is a great example of this. Finally, reading culture should be the first priority for each nation particularly in school and office because there is a great deal of information stored which we may not find out on virtual libraries. That is why many people still choose public libraries instead.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is important to develop keep both public libraries and online libraries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | davidlvg1108 | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
- task 1: member of parliament 78
- writing task 1 the birth rates of China and America 88
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- task 1: marriage and divorce 67
- task 1 the consumption of four different food groups 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59049925874 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3482972135 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8461538462 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100519443583 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404398185944 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325036473797 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637088389056 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224357353159 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.