Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that virtual library plays such an important role in modern life which can take over traditional one. While many people are in favour of this view, I think that keeping conventional library is vital for our life.
On the one hand, it is obvious that online library can replace some of functions of library and it has also many benefits. Firstly, without having to waste time on travelling to library, people who want to read something or look for information can stay at home or anywhere where the internet connected. Furthermore, using the digital library instead of coming to traditional library might help readers to quickly collect a range of knowledge in terms of other fields they concern and easy keeping up to date of news all around the world by performing a click of the mouse. This is because there is a great deal of information and documents on the internet which we might not find out on conventional library.
On the other hand, we cannot deny that there are also several reasons for keeping public libraries. The first reason is that public library is an ordinary place for gathering people of community because people can see, talk each other and enhance their relationship instead of only reading books. As a result, they will become more closer and frequently help each other if anyone has in trouble. Moreover, traditional library always supplies reliable source information since the internet is a virtual world which can be the cause of much untrue information. That is why many people still choose public library instead.
In conclusion, although the internet can alternate some responsibility of conventional library, I strongly believe that keeping public libraries do not squander money and it is really necessary for our life as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | davidlvg1108 | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
- task 1: The spending on different kinds 11
- task 1: the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- task 1: the consumption of four different food groups per person per week 73
- task 1: someland's main export 67
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that virtual library plays su...
^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the functions') or simply say ''some functions''.
Suggestion: some of the functions; some functions
...obvious that online library can replace some of functions of library and it has also many benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...ng books. As a result, they will become more closer and frequently help each other if anyon...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, really, so, still, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98322147651 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65013153509 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9041591919 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188484856703 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070768213061 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494625504091 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118311358352 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313649557019 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.