The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is undeniable that errors in life have been the key to success for many people. Prototypes are highly common in industry nowadays, and they are made in order to detect possible failures in the future. Further emphasizing on this claim, many researchers and technology developers have struggled with reality before being able to obtain the perfect solution for the problem they have been studying. Hence, if this role of errors in reaching the nearest-to-flawless solution is common in most of the fields of knowledge, why should be education different?
I am convinced that ignoring errors or bad actions is not favourable, and it is necessary to highlight and accept them in order to search for things to improve to avoid their repetition in life. To exemplify this, imagine that a child does not know that bullying is a completely loathe act, which immorality cannot be discussed. If his/her teachers and parents ignored the problem, no change in his ethics would take part, and, thus, he would continue doing it without regretting. This view has implicit a way of thinking; this is, that moral and ethics have an important social factor, rather than being totally inherent to our condition as human beings. Nevertheless, as many philosophical and psychological studies support this theory, its validity is plausible.
On the other hand, the ability to recognize errors in an autonomous manner is fundamental to improve our way of doing things in life. If, as a child, one always relied only on his parents or teachers to detect possible errors, without forethinking after doing a work, his/her skills to establish if there are better ways to do things would not be developed. However, this claim does not mean that every negative action should be ignored, but that they should be sometimes highlighted, and a solution ought to be searched by children, rather than by the one who perceives the error.
However, in terms of praising positive actions, I completely agree with that point of view. Many studies have proved that motivation is a crucial factor in productivity for people, and that one of the keys to attain it is giving positive feedback when these actions are done. Who, as a child, did not like to receive positive opinions about the pictures or redactions made, which gave a motivation to continue working like that? If everyone referred to their past experience, it would become clear that this claim is veritable.
As a counterpart to the last argument, an excessive praising can, as well, be negative for children. The main reason for this is that they can become unable to criticize themselves. Additionally, if as a child someone is always told that his/her work is perfect, it is possible that he/she develops a perfectionist personality, which may lead to depression, obsession and anxiety in extreme cases. In this sense, one should control how much positive feedback is given to his/her children.
In conclusion, although I am sure that the praise of positive actions, in a controlled way, is completely advisable, errors should not be ignored, but rather identified in many occasions.
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population gro 69
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...detect possible failures in the future. Further emphasizing on this claim, many researc...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... the fields of knowledge, why should be education different? I am convinced that ignor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an autonomous manner" with adverb for "autonomous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r hand, the ability to recognize errors in an autonomous manner is fundamental to improve our way of do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ike that? If everyone referred to their past experience, it would become clear that this claim ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2615.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06782945736 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8430087242 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521317829457 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1537265007 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.523809524 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136130095439 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440863728705 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343785681966 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794623146777 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394616082303 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.