In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Traditionally, old British people decide to live in retirement living center or nursing housing when they get older and need extra help on a daily basis. This common scenario raise the questions about who should cover the cost for this care, whether the government or their relatives. In my opinion, both public administrations and family must be bear cost.
First, governments hold a social responsibility with their citizens, particularly with the elderly ones. Elder people, during their younger age, contributed with their efforts, work and commitment to build and support nation's economy and its greatness. Also, they religiously paid taxes and any other economy contributions, so they have earned the right to receive back a payment from the local authorities as a subvention or financial assistance to cover the fees to live in a residency.
Second, younger family members have a moral duty to their old ones. They should retributive the care, help and love they once got from their parents or grandparents. In Spain, for instance, there is an unwritten agreement among families (siblings) to take care of their elderly economically, once they are reach a point where special care and attention are needed. However, under the eventual scenario that elderly people don't have relatives left or known, the government must be fully in charge of the well-being and care of them.
To sum up, the cost of living in a retirement community or residency should be comprised by government and family finance contributions, awarding the help they once received from their older citizens and relatives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | yasir2002011 | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | mleopoldo | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | Alex_45 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | Ehsan Razmara | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-27 | ansgusn | 56 | view |
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d 76
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Should teenagers in high school work part-time? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d 58
- Blood sports have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. All blood sports should be banned. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ork and commitment to build and support nations economy and its greatness. Also, they r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the local authorities as a subvention or financial assistance to cover the fees t...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e eventual scenario that elderly people dont have relatives left or known, the gover...
^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...help they once received from their older citizens and relatives.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, well, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24124513619 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86687262569 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.852415402 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.454545455 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278569931737 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10313801057 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641399265814 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169077788054 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839640141563 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.