Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults. Do you agree or disagree.
Parents are highly concerned for providing allowances to youngsters as it ought to be source of exploitation. Despite this, some thought that weekly provision of petty cash will result in fewer financial issues once children grew up. In my opinion, I strongly agree as handling money and expenses from young age promotes saving and develop managerial skills which eventually documents to lesser money issues in adulthood.
To start with, handling petty cash from young age enables individual to save money which aid them in future as well. At present, merely one quarter of children in UK is receiving weekly cash consequently, in order to fulfill their wants these children have to approach their elders. Hence, they are unable to understand value of money and spend it impulsively. According to the survey, these people are facing money driven issues due to lack of saving skill, which can be best built in childhood. Admittedly, saving and financial constraints moves in opposite tandem. Higher savings means fewer financial issues. Hence, it is agreed that pin money influence children for saving which leads to financial prosperity in adulthood.
Another important benefit of weekly pocket money is development of fund management skill in youngster which helps them in later life. Child managing expenses and petty cash is able to decide between needs, luxuries and priorities. Hence, it is broadly accepted that a person who is skill full in these cash management since early age can better handle in adult life and ends up having least monetary issues because they can manage income and expenses efficiently.
To conclude, weekly cash allowances to children is constructive as it promotes savings from kinder age and develop cash management skill which leads to minimal financial issues in adult life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | ziamuneeb | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | Luc1Ferrr | 61 | view |
- Some people think watching movies is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Local people do not go very often to museums or historic sites Why is that so What can be done to change the situation 89
- Some people think that the media newspaper have the right to publish details of people s private life while others think it should be controlled Discuss both views give your opinion 47
- Some people say that Olympic games are not relevant in 21st century Do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'savings'' or 'saving's'?
Suggestion: savings'; saving's
...raints moves in opposite tandem. Higher savings means fewer financial issues. Hence, it...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 379, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the least'.
Suggestion: having the least
...better handle in adult life and ends up having least monetary issues because they can manage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...manage income and expenses efficiently. To conclude, weekly cash allowances to c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minimal financial issues in adult life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, well, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28275862069 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62545845609 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6271814922 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180330218456 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663420835606 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520083324644 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111831925493 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526534941902 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.