Some people argue that space exploration had more to do with national pride than international effort. To what extent do you agree with this?
How do you think space exploration will change in the future?
More people claim that the exploration of universe is possible if there are collaborations with the others countries since they can collaborate as to accomplish the budgets. However, it is projected in the future that each continents can arrange their own space discovery journey through the newest technology.
Having space exploration it will spend a huge number of budgets, so it is hard for several countries which have limited budgets. To tackle this, doing the aerospace project should be arranged internationally in order to share the expenditure. Hong Kong Space Journey (HSJ) for example, it collaborates with U.S, South Korea, and Japan in 1998 to launch the first rocket in Hong Kong which spent about $10,000,000, but fortunately they had collaborated with several aforementioned countries. This is open the opportunities to make the universe discovery without confusing the cost.
Moreover, after the collaborations among the countries it will open the possibilities for those continents to start their own aerospace journey when they already succeeded and get benefits. This will be supported by the advanced technology to make the voyage to whole space are possible. This invention of first rocket as an example, it had been found in 13 AD, so it means there is a chance that the new sophisticated rocket which loads a lot of people to the outside Earth will be found further.
In conclusion, as to corporate the trip into the space, many countries prefer to collaborate with others while it is predicted in the future that each continents can build their own aerospace trips after having profits. This can be happened due to the development of technology that more sophisticated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-24 | Fayna Faradiena | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage in places where students lived over five decades. 67
- These graphs show the result of a survey. 100 people (single men and women and couples with/without children) were interviewed to find out who they typically spend time with on a free day. The percentages shown here are averages.Summarise the information 67
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary schools types between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rder to share the expenditure. Hong Kong Space Journey HSJ for example, it collab...
^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...HSJ for example, it collaborates with U.S, South Korea, and Japan in 1998 to laun...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21532846715 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00341015976 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1500822249 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201014279169 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754540269863 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339260048089 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123355945861 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348153779746 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.