The dangers and complexities of the modern world have made the mobile phone an absolute necessity for children.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that due to the different steep challenges and dangerous events with come along with the modern world, having a mobile phone has turned into an essential need, particularly for children. I firmly agree with this statement as a cellphone represents a safety tool for parents. However, without an adequate supervision, these electronic devices can have negative effects on children life.
The newest smart phones built in GPS (Geographic Positioning System) localisation tool. Parents can locate their children at anytime. For instance, if parents suspect that their daughter or son are skipping the school or visiting suspicious places, the mobile phone can works as a private detective to unearth the truth. Additionally, in the events of an accident, children can communicate immediately with their progenitors and /or the competent authority, reporting the news. Thus, a cellphone is an intrinsic part in people life.
On the down side, mobile phones also open a wide door to the Internet. Children easily can access to any type of information, ranging from the apparently inoffensive social media to pornographic and terrorism videos. If a closely supervision is absent, those children can fall prey easily of criminal organizations, or even worst can commit inadvertently wrongful actions. In Spain, for instance, an teenager (12 years) was murder by her virtual boyfriend at the first date.
To sum up, today is unthinkable live without a cellphone, they make easier life in a number of different ways. However, it can not be denied that if these gadgets are used inappropriately can cause serious damages in our children life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | sabithmohammad | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | JimmyMcgill | 67 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The dangers and complexities of the modern world have made the mobile phone an absolute necessity for children.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities today What are some of the causes of traffic congestion and what measures can be taken to help reduce it 70
- Essay Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities today. What are some of the causes of traffic congestion, and what measures can be taken to help reduce it? has been updated. 89
- A zoo has no useful purpose.Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have negative effects on children life. The newest smart phones built in GPS Geo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...suspicious places, the mobile phone can works as a private detective to unearth the t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: DOWN_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'downside'?
Suggestion: downside
...ntrinsic part in people life. On the down side, mobile phones also open a wide door to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('closely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('supervision') instead of another adjective.
...o pornographic and terrorism videos. If a closely supervision is absent, those children can fall prey...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ongful actions. In Spain, for instance, an teenager 12 years was murder by her vir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, so, thus, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30152671756 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9550489929 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660305343511 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.49641161 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201545728643 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657407009824 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570856138411 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119395804057 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844708821347 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.