the table below shows the percentage of population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011
The given table illustrates the ratio of the population of one town who rode bikes in 2011 divided into age and gender groups.
Overall, the proportion of women who cycled was greater at all ages. Besides, the youngest people rode more than others in age groups.
It is obviously seen in the table that the highest percentage of riders in both genders belonged to people at the age of 0-9 with 51.3% in female and 50.3% in male. In contrast, the people in the range of 40-59 years old witnessed the smallest figures when just about 12.3% women 8.0% men rode bikes.
While in other age groups, the rate of male rider was just slightly smaller than those of female, there was a significant difference in the proportion of cyclists at the age of 10-17. To be more specific, the rate of female who rode bicycles was 42.2%, double more than those of male with 24.6%. Surprisingly, after 60%, these figures in both genders were 18.5% and 12.5% respectively, higher than people belonged to 18-39 and 40-59 age groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 40 | view |
- the chart below shows the annual pay ( thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- in many countries people can eat a wide variety of food today As a result they eat food from other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of the development outweigh disadvantages 76
- the flow chart below show the procedure to get the driving license in US 84
- people s shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than other factors To what extent do you agree and disagree 58
- Some people think teaching children with different abilities benefits everyone while other think intelligent should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67597765363 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35846840329 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6232255123 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236823693192 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10994759017 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109656171491 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174240925257 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123342231414 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.