People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves, their families and the society, so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?
Throughout the history of mankind, there is no doubt that working longer hours has gotten more common in society since it was become a mindset of company’s employers. Nevertheless, its impact on every aspect of life not only brings much controversial debate with regard to serious thought in term of the role of employee’s benefits, but also bring many negative effects on their families and community as a whole. Therefore, i totally agree the idea of limiting working time.
First and foremost, it is irrefutable that working with extend hours results in the deterioration of individual’s health. The first reason to support it is that being exerted of a huge amount of many tasks and concentrating on work at long hours could hold the possibility of many extensive damage against one’s physical condition and metal health simultaneously. Moreover, spending more time in workplace instead of leisure thing with friends could probably burn the budget of life. It stands to the reason that having less time to care for the other relationships, people might also take psychological disturbance with regard to their families, soul mates as well as their lovers. Hence, human might possibly get an isolated phenomenon, which suffered from their stress and depression.
Furthermore, this not only brought negative impacts upon worker’s brain, expanded working time could also cause to the organization. By exploiting labour resources, many company around the world could expect the higher quality in output with lower expenditure. To illustrate, we can see clearly from thousands of people in japanese company, a place which is infamous for the term of overtime working, are constituting the suicidal thought at young age of job holders because of much superior’s pressure. Moreover, although employer promised the maximum benefits from a limited resource for those who were able to afford extend working hours, it cannot verify the fact that it could not get the destructive effects in the long-term. The primary’s reason is that employees tend to be less productive, and meanwhile, at great risks of sickness and absenteeism. As a result, employer have to spend much more time no recruiting and training new candidates. To a country as a whole, it has a chronic effect, disabling the optimisation of resource use, human capital and natural resources.
As the aforementioned drawbacks and reasons, there is obviously no reason accounting for why working long hours can be acceptable. In short, job holders could be more sick leaves and less productive, thereby taking more harm than good to them and the corporates as well.
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 73
- Fashion is difficult to follow, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to control violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this action? 84
- Fashion is difficult to follow and some people argue that we should not follow it They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun damage seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extensive damage', 'a good deal of extensive damage'.
Suggestion: much extensive damage; a good deal of extensive damage
...ong hours could hold the possibility of many extensive damage against one's physical condition a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: might; possibly
...s as well as their lovers. Hence, human might possibly get an isolated phenomenon, which suffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'might'.
Suggestion: might
...s as well as their lovers. Hence, human might possibly get an isolated phenomenon, which suffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to extend'
Suggestion: to extend
...ource for those who were able to afford extend working hours, it cannot verify the fac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in short, no doubt, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31516587678 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05335868492 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587677725118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3116021775 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.941176471 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233360037422 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743745870232 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675563862931 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153492183289 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379735329936 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.