The state of the enviroment is now a cause for concern in all countries across the world. Apart from government measures ad policies, what can individuals do on a personal level to combat the negative effects that our lifestyles have on the enviroment?
Nowadays, due to modernization, a sudden increase in environmental degradation is noted. All the countries, more or less are facing this ever-increasing problem. Along with government policies, it is the duty of one to stand and fight for mother earth.
To begin with, a plethora of agreements are signed between various nations but a little is done for it. so it becomes more important of an individual to take part. For instance, to produce electricity a lot of fossil fuels are burnt out, so by minimizing the use of it may add a positive aspect to it. Moreover, air conditioners emit CFC which is harmful to the ozone layer. A collaborative step is needed against this. In addition, state transportation should be preferred more than private individuals. To exemplify, while traveling to the office or any other public place, a common mode of transport should opt in order to decrease traffic congestion which would eventually lead to less emission of toxic gases.
To add, instead of just focusing on prevention, a step is essential towards depletion as well. More trees should be planted. A rule should be made in the community to plant at least 10 flora or fauna in a week. Finally, the use of crackers should be prohibited by one so as to help the environment to sustain itself. For example, I myself refrain from fireworks because india is one of the most contaminated kingdoms in the world. As published by the UN, the top 8 states are from india in the list of maximum polluted ones.
To Conclude, a step in unison should be opted in all parts of the world in order to promote a healthy environment and all should stand tall against the mess which we have made otherwise, indeed, it would be difficult of the human race to survive.
- Many people believe money is a very important consideration when choosing a job as it can help you get a better lifestyle; however, there are some who believe it is more important to have a job you enjoy and that this, and not money, will lead to greater 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- With the increasing popularity of computers and calculators student literacy is decreasing dramatically What are the positive and negative effects the progress of science and technology has brought about 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fauna' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'faunae', 'faunas'.
Suggestion: faunae; faunas
...community to plant at least 10 flora or fauna in a week. Finally, the use of crackers...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...of crackers should be prohibited by one so as to help the environment to sustain itself....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72459016393 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89116382655 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.565859169 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7647058824 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889177875063 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260354018205 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302635019445 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056605506898 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124592429404 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.