Discuss the consequences of deforestation.
For decades, deforestation has never failed to attract public attention since it has been exerting numerous adverse impacts on environment. This essay will analyse two major repercussions that are probably the most severe.
To begin with, deforestation has been long perceived as being the chief culprit of both wildlife and human habitat destruction. Firstly, even though over-logging has been curbed in developed nations, many third-world governments neglect sustainable forest management. As a result, this malfunction pushes many species to the brink of extinction when their home, forests, is being narrowed down at an alarming rate. Furthermore, in order to maintain ecological equilibrium, a balanced food web is required, which means the adaptations of few animals to the shrinkage in forest area and habitat loss do not help and the vanishing of any species will eventually result in ripple effects on ecosystems. Secondly, extensive logging is the underlying cause of many disasters directly harmful to our life like flooding and desertification. These, in fact, bring out declines in soil fertility and subsequently in crop yields and are responsible for a substantial number of fatalities annually. It is also noticeable that a few ethnic minorities have been suffering from deforestation since in terms of economic and cultural aspects, they have barely exhibited a complete interdependence on forest resources.
The second consequence is that over-logging and the warming of the Earth are strongly correlated. First, it is a common fact that trees are efficient tools to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, one of the key factors triggering global warming; therefore, excessive cutting of them literally undermines all efforts many nations have put into carbon offsetting. In addition, deforestation in some cases is to accommodate industrial sector and residential growth. Thus, without a decent balance between logging and reforestation, the more our population grows, the more carbon footprint escalates.
To sum up, deforestation is not merely causing the reduction of tree canopy cover as it has insidious effects on the ecosystem and human life and bears a close relation to global warming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-16 | xxlusubuxx | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-10 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- To what extent are people in your country interested in vegetarianism? Why? 89
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 89
- It is more important for schoolchildren to study local history than international history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Should we ban plastic bags? 89
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbing. What factors contribute to job satisfation? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te interdependence on forest resources. The second consequence is that over-logg...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, in addition, in fact, as a result, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57566765579 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15834635053 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649851632047 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0860878724 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.214285714 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0169599502641 0.244688304435 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00833698110431 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300594128542 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00938859262935 0.151304729494 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162615194456 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.