Many people today use their mobile phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages?
Nowadays, mobile phones are been used for texting rather than phone calls usages. However, this is a function that new generations are using more than others. I am strongly convinced that text messages have a plethora more advantages than disadvantages. The aim of this essay is to review the pros and cons of texting over phone calls.
texting is the best way to avoid an uncomfortable phone conversation or disturb someone with a calling due to this is not a communication way that has to be answered straight away in a real-time, for instance, some companies rather than call their customers, send them a text message to let them know some promotions or notify them any important information they may know. Furthermore, technology has adapted emoticons which could be used to add emotions to any text message.
On the other hand, phone calls are an effective communication method, if the user needs to contact someone immediately because a phone call has to be answered in real-time otherwise the message could not be able to be delivered. An example of this is emergency calls like 911 line( in the USA), where a phone call method has to be the only way to solve emergencies or in many cases save a life. Anyhow a phone call has much more restrictions to communicate a message.
Historically, phone calls have been used more than texting, but it is been changing with the current generations, to sum up, chatting by text results a communication way with more pros than cons due to its diversity of uses and apps (like Whatsapp, messenger, Facebook life) supporting the texting culture.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-04 | davidlvg1108 | 84 | view |
2019-04-01 | Amby | 89 | view |
2019-03-28 | vadhrahmanjit@gmail.com | 71 | view |
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.What can companies do to increase staff productivity? 61
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Many people today use their mobile phones for sending texts more than talking What are the reasons for this Are there more advantages than disadvantages 84
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home withother old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimesthe government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Give 67
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that it is a good thing,while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Texting
... cons of texting over phone calls. texting is the best way to avoid an uncomfortab...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...void an uncomfortable phone conversation or disturb someone with a calling due to...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sturb someone with a calling due to this is not a communication way that has to b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for instance, in many cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88602941176 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87239190789 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.007038594 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 132.9 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324113865707 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1512618099 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896900547694 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219857802304 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12715077026 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.