It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important?
Do you agree or disagree?
There have been instances when the ruling administration has been blamed for spending enormously on wildlife protection, whereas other major issues of public importance have been inadequately financed or are neglected. This might be true in a few cases but usually the cause of protection of these undomesticated animal species is ill financed and facing deteriorating spending. Thus, I disagree with the above view and my opinion on it is further elaborated below.
The human species cannot sustain alone on this planet, since there is a whole food chain in which one organism is dependent on the other. Thus, it becomes extremely necessary to protect the wildlife as there have been many species which have already become extinct or are endangered and hence, conserving the ecosystem. Sometimes we as human species do get so self consumed that we forget that there are other species as-well which needs to be protected and given their due share and because of it the funds allocated for their protection seems futile.
From quiet a few years the forest cover is continuously decreasing so as to meet human needs with the increasing human population and demands. The invasion of human to the animal habitat has also increased manyfold which has greatly impacted the life of many wildlife species and causing them great harm which has even lead to species like the India's national animal, Bengal tiger becoming endangered.
Thus, to sum up, I would say that yes their might be some issues that have failed to catch the eye of the government but wildlife protection is also one of the very prominent matters which cannot be neglected therefore, I don't think it is possible to cut the funds allocated for it. It is only when human and wildlife live in harmony with each other, then this world can prosper and live long.
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? (Reported 2017 11
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people say that increasing the price of fattening foods will solve this problem. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important?Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...protection seems futile. From quiet a few years the forest cover is continuous...
^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...forest cover is continuously decreasing so as to meet human needs with the increasing hu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... causing them great harm which has even lead to species like the Indias national ani...
^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... which cannot be neglected therefore, I dont think it is possible to cut the funds a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95114006515 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59454790873 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6671711691 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833393337408 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335738217634 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240987361005 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509420825405 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318472842089 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.