teachers should make social and political views in the classroom
Having a glimpse of our educational circle, many parents start to pay more attention to what teachers convey in class. In order to help students to be competitive in the future, a lot of methods have been adopted by teachers when that are teaching. Depending on different personal experiences and personality types, people may differ differently when asking about whether teachers should make social and political views in the classroom. In my opinion, I believe it is a good idea to improve students’ ability. I am going to elaborate my point from perspectives of.
First of all, the most primary reason is that teachers sharing their own thought about the society is the most suitable way for students to learn more about the whole world which is totally separated from the campus. Nowadays, the more you know about all sorts of events around us, the more likely you will make success in the future. It is often reported that many new graduates from ordinary colleges such as North Seattle can only get a respective low pay when they are employed for the first time. However, after several works, they have opportunities to be promoted to the management classes since they are more knowledgeable based on their teachers' information. Therefore, it is really a good choice to delivery teachers' views which will enable students to be more experienced in the future.
Moreover, these views about society conveyed by teachers can not only provide students with knowledge but also can help students to increase their ability of discussion. We all know that expressing one’s points means communicating with each other. Take me for example. My professor always tells his opinions about politicians in class. Also, he encourages everyone to utter their own thoughts. Because of this process, my classmates and I often practice how to defend our points and form our own speaking styles. As a result, expressing one’s thoughts properly actually allows us to learn more about communication skills.
Nevertheless, sometimes teachers may explain thoughts about our society too much instead of teaching professional knowledge base. In fact, many professors can control their time in class because most of them know exactly the main task is studying subjects.
In conclusion, what I covered above is several concrete benefits in terms of present and future. By talking more about our society and politicians, we can find more unique about the globe and live fuller lives.
- Schools always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers whoperform well. Which way do you think is more useful？1.to evaluate teachers' performance by students.2.to evaluate teachers' perf 76
- For success in a future job it is more important to relate well with others than to study hard in school. (A/D) 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In any society, the contributions of scientists and engineers are more important than the contributions of artists and writers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- smart car 70
- in order to make freshmen adapt to college life, which one is more helpful? 1.take part in the orientation program for a week; 2.meet regularly with seniors in the same major 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, you know, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17121588089 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7566953936 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573200992556 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.618585532 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2380952381 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1904761905 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163171163722 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040340131685 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808086165077 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854190144925 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952623538887 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.