Foreign languages should be a compulsory subject for children at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that children should learn a second language from young age. In my opinion, I firmly agree with this idea since learning a new language is a good way to develop children’s brain and it also benefits the field of science of a country.
Firstly, learning foreign language clearly contributes a large part in brain development. Brain is like a muscle that functions better with exercise. Learning a new language involves memorizing and applying rules, that is perfect exercise for brain. Take myself as an example; when I studied English, I had to learn by heart, constantly recall new words in many topics, such as nature, environment, etc. I also took many lengthy grammatically lessons, from simple tense to complex conditional sentences. As a result, the hours of learning English trained my brain to think logically to organize all vocabulary and grammar I had learned.
Secondly, countries requiring students to study foreign languages will be better off through the inheritance of scientific achievement. Those students studying a new language from a young age tend to go abroad to continue learning and researching and then bring back advanced technologies and knowledge to their home country. For example, the Vietnamese government sent engineers to Soviet Union to study civil engineering, that was a good chance for students to be taught by Russian experts. After a period of studying abroad, they eventually returned to Vietnam, constructed the major hydroelectricity dam in Hoa Binh, contributing significantly to national grids in Vietnam.
To conclude, for the reasons mentioned above, I fully believe that foreign languages should be included as a mandatory subject in school curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | aria etemadi | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alex Yan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | zixuan | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | TRẦN ĐỨC HUY | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Annie_Lam | 73 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- In recent years, the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...andatory subject in school curriculum.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36764705882 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06189749387 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7538574911 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18874107772 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699757899241 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783367962146 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143165181425 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867321935482 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.