In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often argued that governments should pour public purse into the exploration of space because of the difficulty of sustaining life on the earth these days. Personally, I disagree with this opinion for a number of reasons.
There are several drawbacks of government spending on scouring the universe for an inhabitable planet. Firstly, searching the galaxy causes an utter waste of public money. Expenses such as space probes, equipment or researching and developing cost are expensive. Therefore, such expenditures put unnecessary pressure on public budget while various countries could allocate those money for dealing with several problems. Furthermore, there is little likelihood to find out a planet on which human can live. Human has spent decades researching a glimmer of hope for a sign of life on other planets but they received nothing. Even if there was an inhabitable planet existed in the cosmos, it might be far millions of years of light from us.
Instead of spending public budget on looking for life on the galaxy, the government should consider the following opinions to make the earth a better place. Apart from current environmental law, the state might enact punishments for illegal activities such as hunting or deforestation. This action brings about stronger protection on the environment. Besides, the state should harness eco-friendly energy to reduce the reliance on fossil fuel. The increase in green resources offers humanity a safe and healthy community environment. They could also launch campaigns to arm people with awareness about the earth’s current issues. Every effort would help to bring back the green earth we used to have.
In conclusion, I disagree that nations invest public money in turning the cosmos inside out because of the potential problems and the ability of better measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | Meet2607 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | Evelyn_Han | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | linhrj35 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | Bhimani Nikunj | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | Thuan Hoang | 84 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 84
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Prison is a common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people a better education. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is often argued that governments shou...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his opinion for a number of reasons. There are several drawbacks of governmen...
^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
... while various countries could allocate those money for dealing with several problems. Furt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r millions of years of light from us. Instead of spending public budget on ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...back the green earth we used to have. In conclusion, I disagree that nation...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3470790378 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80585402446 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4281235843 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176585671756 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506159240011 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289733330833 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936174631532 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370245888892 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.