Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it?
Recently the phenomenons of the change in law and its corresponding impacts on human behaviour have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex laws are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that change in law can be a plus and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer the society some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that human behaviour is directly impacted by any changes to the law and current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, law changes might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the change in law far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 55
- is joint family necessary today? 77
- Problem and benefits of the high school students study plays and the work of the theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 55
- Which car will you prefer large or small 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51417004049 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14359369472 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655870445344 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3720369949 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257919171351 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841022750692 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645492674434 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14021436997 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039908065852 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.