All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
The growing pollution and its harmful effects over the years have inclined the people to think that the cars running on fossil fuels should be banned and replaced with electric cars. Even I think the same, as these do not contributes to pollution and are more economical to the user.
Over the last decade people are tend to be more aware of the carbon footprints and its side effects on the surroundings, in such a case, cars which have o footprints and leaves no residue can act as a great deal. Additionally, as these are charged via electricity which is renewable energy and can be produced in each household makes it's more feasible over the others. For Instance, Bharat Benz a leading Indian car manufacturing company proposed a design of its new E-Car which only require 1 hour of charging through any switchboard and can last to 8-hour ride with a full load.
Secondly, due to the increasing scarcity of petroleum in the international market, the prices fluctuate and usually remains out of reach for an average individual. Creating a better sustainable replacement can easily make things fit in the pocket, as electricity is cheaper and the government does not charge extra taxes on using the same for the transportation services. Moreover, if proper maintenance is done these cars can easily give more mileage than the one renewable resources. For example, the Maruti Swift is assembled to give an output of 60-kilometer in a unit, which is 4 times more than other cars running in the same race. Such conditions make the usage of electric cars in days today's life a better investment for an ordinary person.
To close, although the power produced by cars using fossil fuels is comparatively high, the destruction produced by it towards nature can outweigh the advantage. In my opinion, people should start using electric cars as they are cheap and physically more eco-friendly to nature.
- In the 21st century, the ease of traveling to any part of the world has been increased, which certainly has inclined people to create a mindset that countries having people from different nationalities are able to be more developed than the other. I total 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 89
- individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.Discuss both these views and giv 73
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'contribute'?
Suggestion: contribute
... Even I think the same, as these do not contributes to pollution and are more economical to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers. For Instance, Bharat Benz a leading Indian car manufacturing company propose...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93769470405 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79006357125 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9967057013 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24425054517 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091441761447 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792668268688 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166804566774 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712012565441 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.