Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is generally argued among the most of the people that, certain exhibition center like museums and galleries received the entrance amount, however, others would offer as a free entry. This essay argued that the advantage of this clearly outweigh the disadvantage. The essay will first demonstrate that, the sustainability of the institution is the biggest advantage of this, followed by an analysis of how the primary drawbacks, namely the poor management.
With regards to the positive concern, charging certain amount as a tariff to the public by such archive would provide the more comprehensive services to the viewers for long term. Such institution generally open with huge budget in regards to preserve rare species and shows to the tourist and impacts of such views further helps to expend individual horizon of understanding for long term. This is most evident in my country that, zoo and national gallery would take the lower charges to the visitor during their entrance considering to strengthening the institutional services for future endeavor.
Those opposed to this say that, providing free entrance to the visitors may create the future problem of weak management of the species and the institution. Such kind of free allows more people to have an access with knowledge and the exhibition center would not able to provide justifiable services to the right person because of crowdedness. As a result of that, the services provided for the public would have possibility to close in long run. A recent study conducted by department of environment under ministry of culture and wild life preservation found that, 25% of the national exhibition center in Nepal would provide poor services to the visitors and because of that they are nearly in the position of remain closed in coming future.
In conclusion, paying certain amount of money as an entrance fee is always advantage if it further helps towards the future sustainability of institution and the species along with the individual skills clearly outweigh the flawed argument of less effective management system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | benedetta | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | mickeybin2211 | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | karkidilip | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | karkidilip | 67 | view |
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past. Why?Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...itution generally open with huge budget in regards to preserve rare species and shows to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...kind of free allows more people to have an access with knowledge and the exhibition cente...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of less effective management system.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2328358209 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82175616659 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50447761194 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.829799135 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.363636364 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4545454545 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109643545025 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048412363225 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295746664312 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659606666027 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264736638745 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.