In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. Is it realistic to combine them at the same time? Support your opinion with examples.
One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that in order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time, and it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There is a number of arguments in favor of my stance. Most preponderant one is that combining learning and employment at the same time can not only contribute in the overall growth of a student, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but it can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives. Needless to say, all these merits stand good in one stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence are concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of learning and employment at the same time. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on student's lifestyle is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many feel that it is not realistic to combine learning and employment at the same time.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks the benefits of doing learning and employment at the same time are indeed too great to ignore.
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. Is it realistic to combine them at the same time? Support your opin 75
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons and/or your personal experience. 80
- Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music and painting. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to doso. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 82
- Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music and painting. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nging lifestyle. Besides, its impact on students lifestyle is far-reaching indeed. Hence...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun feel seems to be countable; consider using: 'many feels'.
Suggestion: many feels
...ching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many feel that it is not realistic to combine lea...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76523709028 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513605442177 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6397999184 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405360061493 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146538174239 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177378315983 0.071462118173 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252232618201 0.151781067708 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689192578632 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.