As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it?
There is an increasingly ubiquitous belief that there are various obstacles which Asian countries have to cope with. From my perspective, I believe poverty is the greatest challenge of all.
There are several reasons why this phenomenon has a devastating effect on numerous communities. Firstly, poverty acts a deterrent to economic development. Due to the shortage of financial funds for mass production, citizens living in a particular region have to make strenuous efforts to produce goods but they only generate a trivial amount of merchandise in a short period, preventing the region from enhancing the living standards. Secondly, poverty results in the degradation of the education system essential to enhance personal development. Therefore, adolescents barely having opportunities to accumulate knowledge, which deters them from engaging in developing the economy.
As a young generation, I am of the opinion that my peers and I have a vital role in the process of curbing poverty from continuously taking place. One thing we can do is putting more efforts to associate with international technical assistance. If developing nations achieve supports regarding innovative technology in the manufacture, numerous commodities will be produced in a short period, and thus the unemployment rate will plummet significantly and there will be an increase in the national income, paving the way for regional development. Additionally, in order to deal with the lack of the educational standard, my companions and I are able to organize unsolicited classes for impoverished children. Although these educational provisions are not as solid as that of prestigious institutions, I assume it would make contributions to alleviating the aforementioned issue.
In conclusion, I believe young people should participating in charitable activities such as teaching disadvantaged children and building relationships with friends living beyond their national boundaries to address poverty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-31 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 95 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 11 | view |
- Everyone should stay at school until 18.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 95
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 84
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7619047619 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38363408066 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639455782313 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4694589824 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.307692308 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107989891476 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320209724851 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278563087192 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663981197737 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223273363965 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.