The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of students in different gender who study Computer Science at a UK university over a three-year period.
At first glance, it was noticeable that the number of both sexes of the student who studying this subject had risen, expect Britain men. Males from the UK were more fond of this subject than international students. However, it had also shown a fluctuation during this aforesaid period, from around 40 in 2010 to 24 in 2011 and had risen to 43 in 2012. On the other hand, males from different countries who chosen Computer Science had increased. As can be seen, within 25 of them were interested in 2010 and 2011, but it had climb dramatically to over 35 of them during 2012.
As the graph indicates, Computer Science was a favourable subject for British home female students. Not to mention, the proportion of women who chosen this subject had increased, which was from approximately 32 in 2010 to 45 in 2012. Furthermore, international female students had an insignificant risen by only 6 of them.
To sum up, it was evident that students year by year had gained an interest in Computer Science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-23 | Bikram12299 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | Jasmineeee | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Abhayraj | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | Rozmin | 78 | view |
| 2016-10-14 | hyangsu21@hanmail.net | 73 | view |
- The Internet has caused people to be isolated from their real lives Do you agree or disagree 87
- Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past.Do you agree or disagree? 91
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'climbed'.
Suggestion: climbed
...interested in 2010 and 2011, but it had climb dramatically to over 35 of them during ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'climbed'.
Suggestion: climbed
...interested in 2010 and 2011, but it had climb dramatically to over 35 of them during ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...them. To sum up, it was evident that students year by year had gained an interest in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8578680203 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83832159355 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4989361461 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228545793097 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956486944802 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879618218145 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164564454226 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109826514921 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.