Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25 year old is necessary?
Recently, the phenomenon of participating in voting elections and giving the driving lisence to the youths who are under the 25 years old and their corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although these allowances are beneficial as they are regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that they can be plus if they run by considering some issues.
From a social standpoint, the idea of giving premission to the young generation who are below the 25 years old to vote or drive provides society with the noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of legislating strict legislation. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment whch discovered these benefits. firstly, this issue have positive effects on children's attitudes abd behaviour and enhance their confidence. Furthermore, it might develop some other skills including social, community, decision making and teamwork skills. Moreover, encountering the young people to such these situations like have the ability to choose their popular politicians or their own style of driving might increase their responsibilities.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of permitting the youngsters to attend the elections and drive by their own cars have some opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, the young people blamed for the significance proportion of roud accidents. In addition, the opponents asserted that this part of nation have inadequate ability to think ideally and they are not competent to vote or drive.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of permitting the youths under 25 years old to drive and vote are far more outweigh their demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 77
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...eriment whch discovered these benefits. firstly, this issue have positive effects on ch...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39730639731 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06394716384 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6240249811 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222931542893 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713049600187 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801477374242 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13717744766 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287777352485 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.