day off after having the baby
In many parts of the world, females are permitted to take time off from work when having the baby during the first month. While this tendency has some drawbacks, I would argue that there are far more benefits.
From an overall perspective, this phenomenon seems to be detrimental simply because many companies would limit job opportunities for women. To addition, time off from work for a long time would cause problems for companies which have a high number of female employees. Thus, these companies would avoid renting women employees to tackle this problem, and then women fired would find it more difficult in search of stable employment.
In spite of the arguments above, I believe that this phenomenon is also positive for the following reasons. The first argument is that taking the day off after women having the baby during the first month would be an important role to enhance the health of women and their babies. To evidence, after having the baby, women’s body would be weak and the infants should need to be looked after directly by their mother. Therefore, women should need enough time to not only recover but also stay beside their offspring until they would be ready for work. Equally important is that this trend is a good way to improve the birth rate in modern time. Take an example, in advanced countries, where people would be faced with the aging population because women would want to delay having babies in order to concentrate on their career. Consequence, women would want to have babies when they receive the benefits from the company as well as the government yet.
In conclusion, although I recognize the possible negative effects of this tendency, it seems to me that it is a negative development overall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: ON_ADDITION[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in'?
Suggestion: In
...ould limit job opportunities for women. To addition, time off from work for a long...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ing until they would be ready for work. Equally important is that this trend is a good ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90878378378 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48295642118 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3340068229 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217781616514 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808933721343 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102169062241 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114607674291 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949600339417 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.