traffic jam
In modern time, the issue of traffic jam has become a matter for discussion. Many commentators are of the view that the authorities can solve this problem by constructing more train and metro line. Whereas other fell that constructing more roads and expanding existing roads will solve traffic jam. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and provide an overall opinion.
From an overall perspective, the first view seems to be reasonable simply because the success of advanced countries shows that trains and underground lines are an appropriate way to tackle traffic congestion. Take an example, in Taipei which is the capital city in Taiwan, where people used to experience of the high level of traffic jam owning to too many private vehicles. Thus, the government who invested heavily in modern railway systems now is no longer see serious traffic congestion.
Perhaps the main reason why people are favour in constructing more roads and expanding existing roads is that train and metro lines would be not suitable for an urgent situation. In evidence, the development of the railway system would be time-consuming and require a huge amount of money. Therefore, the government should consider alternative solutions to tackle traffic congestion in the short term. Equally important is that some roads now would be overloaded owning to high traffic volume. To illustrate, in Ho Chi Minh city, where many roads are narrow or in poor conditions which cause traffic congestion. Consequence, these roads should wide and the government should create new roads to reduce traffic pressure on the old system.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments of the first idea, it seems to me that there are more persuasive reasons to agree with the opposite second view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | VinLloyd | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Shodiyona | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Shodiyona | 56 | view |
- old building 89
- Some people think that it is so difficult for poor people or people from rural areas to go to university so that the university should make it especially easy to them. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- pressuring on students 61
- use modern sources instead of real book 73
- Team or group activities can teach more important skills for life than those done alone. To what extend, do you agree or disagree with this statements ? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gument and provide an overall opinion. From an overall perspective, the first v...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...longer see serious traffic congestion. Perhaps the main reason why people are f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...e traffic congestion in the short term. Equally important is that some roads now would ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce traffic pressure on the old system. In conclusion, although I recognize poss...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17993079585 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73809357104 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4792459576 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284110645245 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106588293974 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107059151143 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161055676208 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104495182583 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.