Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about which type of sports is better for them to participate in. While many individuals think that it is better to take part in private sports, I believe that playing group sports is more advantageous.
Solo sports can help people to improve their independence. Take swimming for example. If swimmers want to win a match of swimming, they have to make every possible effort to gain goals by themselves as there is no one else to rely on. Consequently, they could build up their self-decision skills and other independent skills. Furthermore, playing sports individually can avoid minimally physical accidents. It is obvious that in privately sporting champions like tennis and swimming match, athletes do not need to be jostle directly between members and opponents, which could prevent participants from serious injuries such as bone-broken and sprain.
Playing sports in a team is more beneficial to human life than individual ones. Playing sports with teammates can bring a lot of benefits to participants’ health condition. For example, the high degree of physical demanding does playing football requires. Therefore, soccer players can improve their physical stamina during the time for practice and competition. Secondly, while a number of positive impacts on health that playing in a group with many members has as solo sports have, this form of sports plays a vital role in social skills. In facts, playing football or basketball requires participants to cooperate with other teammates. As a result, they could improve their team-working skills.
In conclusion, while individual sports bring about undeniable benefits, I argue that people should devote more of their spare time to playing team sports
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | nguyen thi thu hien | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-20 | Hoangduyphuc | 73 | view |
- In recent years, the development of traffic safety has been gradually a subject of increasing concern. I agree that using stricter punishments on driving offences is a useful way to rising road safety, but it is not the only method. So I total disagree th 56
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their spare time to playing team sports
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37591240876 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91113019152 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4680953966 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316562222924 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101461249081 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889897021366 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221836579512 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942378810464 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.