Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
it is often said that the punishments for someone who commit a crime should be standardized despite some people believe that establishing an individual disposal for each crime is better. this essay will discuss both viewpoints and express my opinions.
To begin with, people reckon that the advantages of standardized punishments considerably outweigh the disadvantages. The main reason of this belief is that it is cheaper to manage and more efficient. Parking tickets may be a good illustration. If every one of these cases have to attend to court as well as be ruled by the judge, the cost of this measurement will be extremely high and the time of judgement is wasted. Therefore, standardized handling may save the expense effectively and be fairer since the judgement of each one is treated with the same regardless the race and gender.
On the other hand, it is also possible to measure the crime with the separate situation and motivation. Sometimes, people is forced to commit a crime about murder due to reasons like self-defense. Obviously, this should be an independent case for the crime. Furthermore, treating of crime should be divided to different species clearly, such as a poor guy who steals the food on supermarket as he need to feed his family should not be punished compared with someone who steals a car because he wants to show wealthy.
In conclusion, both policies also exist their merits on different circumstances. However, I usually think that making a suitable settlement for each crime’s is better to keep the safety over the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | cocococo123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often said that the punishments for ...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...dual disposal for each crime is better. this essay will discuss both viewpoints and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02681992337 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95236522402 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1159726711 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.923076923 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353627651462 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114811549607 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128909622796 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216067899647 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113425565471 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.