Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.
What are the reasons for this?
Does it have a good or a bad effect on children?
In this modernised era, youngsters tends to spend most of their daytime being sedentary and immersing deeply in latest technology rather than communicating with their family and friends. Therefore, they scarcely know that this tendency leads to a failure in achieving their optimal sensory and motor development.
First and foremost, there is no doubt that today’s technology is a train that will continually move forward and these have brought to us a cascade of positive effects. However, today’s youngsters seem to spend most of their time in front of the screen sending online messages, playing video games and watch television without joining outdoor activities and sports. Moreover, digital temptation leads to a deep and irreversible chasm between parents and child. As a matter of fact, connection through communicating seems to be a basic foundation to hold family together. Nevertheless, the disintegration may break this core value unless parent do not realise the importance of interacting with each other. For example, reminiscing the last 20 years, after dining time is the time for family to play indoor games, talking about their day life and understanding their family members’ thoughts and feelings. Nowadays, while social life is becoming harsher and harsher, both parents and children rely heavily on digital equipment for entertainment.
As a result, this chronic state leads to the fact that technology overuse might kinder children’s developmental milestones. In clarification, it is obvious that most of the teenagers who choose digital technology as a mean of entertainment are easily in high state of suffering visual and auditory diseases. Besides, they may not have a healthy bodies like nature-based children who prefer taking part in outdoor activities and sports. Being straightforward, they might suffer global epidemics such as diabetes, obesity, especially autism.
In conclusion, it is supposed that there is no denial about modern technological benefits. However, children who use digital equipment should be under parents’ control in order to avoid overusing and be addicted. Then they may have a strong body with optimal sensory and motor systems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | dlswife | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 77 | view |
- The table below gives information about employment sectors in which people from 3 age groups worked 85
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? 78
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think it should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity.What are the primary causes of loss of biodiversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the latest'.
Suggestion: in the latest
...me being sedentary and immersing deeply in latest technology rather than communicating wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, talking about, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59347181009 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0936621564 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608308605341 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4303182843 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210248522339 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607608457166 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518347780208 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123712220207 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366508139908 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.