"In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed". Does a common man suffer from a group's ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.

Essay topics:

"In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed". Does a common man suffer from a group's ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.

Recently, the phenomenon of a war of ideas has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it helpful or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that a group's ideologist is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social point of view, a group's ideologist is bound up inextricably with getting killed, which indicates they lead to both suffered people and different views. As a well–known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between killing and suffering people as well as an exponential increase in generating ideas. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of various opinions is correlated positively with not only a group's idea but also man's ideology.
Within the realm the general science, without the slightest doubt, man's ideology attribute to a group's idea, in that it would come down to getting killed, different groups and opinions. A salient example of such attribution is ideal people, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take people's ideas for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the critical problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of a war of ideas.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above. I firmly believe that the advantages of a war of ideas are of more significance.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-14 bita_harzandi@yahoo.com 77 view
2019-07-14 bita_harzandi@yahoo.com 77 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bita_harzandi@… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...Whereas it is a widely held view that a groups ideologist is highly beneficial, I will...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...ssay. From the social point of view, a groups ideologist is bound up inextricably wit...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...s correlated positively with not only a groups idea but also mans ideology. Within th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...est doubt, mans ideology attribute to a groups idea, in that it would come down to get...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above....
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28125 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11434707681 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9021566046 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187722586824 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644076430933 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530184100124 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952084851833 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759001062528 0.0609392437508 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.