Monthly expenditure by British household from 1990 to 2010
The bar chart compares the amount of money British spent on household over the course of 20 years, from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the cost paid for all household demands, including utility bills, transports, rent, and groceries experienced an upward trend, with an exception for entertainment.
Look at the bar chart for more detail, we can see that the amount paid for rent and entertainment dominated in monthly cost of British. In 1990, the cost for rent was 450 pounds per month, which was 150 pounds less than that in 2010. From 1990 to 2010, Groceries witnessed a slight increase, at 320 pounds and 340 pounds, respectively.
It is obvious that British spent a small amount of money on utility bills, transports, and entertainment. In 1990, utility bills costed British 90 pounds per month, which was a half that of transport at the same time. However, these types of cost was then double in 2010, with 150 pounds for utility and 250 pounds for transport. The striking feature was the expenditure of entertainment, which observed a downward trend, from 120 pounds in 1990, remaining stable in 2000, and losing momentum to reach its rock bottom at 100 pounds at the end of timescale surveyed.
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries 11
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there 68
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- While people consider global warming. Discuss both views 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67732784519 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4764277403 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296746284196 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133471753319 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878973631053 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198245963954 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106697962326 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.