The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general
welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning
for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The vast wealth of Gaddafi, the ruler of libya, was well known. But the genral condition of the people of Libya were very poor. There are so many example like this where the achievement of a particular person might stand out but that does not indicates how well a nation is doing. The most comprehensive indication of how a nation is doing is the by the life style and standard of living of its mass people.
Individual achievements never represent the condition of the whole nation. It is possible that an anomaly might have occured. If we look at Pakistan, where the condition of human rights are egregious, a intenationally recognised social advocate like Malala has risen. But that does not mean the whole country is thriving in this sector. Again, If we look at Bangladesh, the unemployment rate is sky rocketing. Many graduates are not getting jobs despite having a proper education. But the GDP of bangladesh is ever high. This is because of the few business sectors controlled by political parties, that are doing well. But this does not give the clear picture of the sufferings of the young generation in Bangladesh. Furthermore, India has produced so many CEO of several multinational companies, but still lack in providing the basic sanitation facilities which resulted many serious contagious diseases in the recent time.
At the same time, if we focus on developed coutries, like United states, Finland, Germany etc. all of these countries have focused more on the civil rights issues. They have placed a goverment system which is bound to answer to the calls of the mass people. There are so many programs that actually take of the people even when they are not contributing much value to the society. This is because one nation cannot move forward relying on only few people. The nations as a whole have to be taken care of if they want to be successful. We have seen Leader Like Aung Sang Syu Ki, Who was championed as Human Right activist, turned a blind eye to the attrion done by the army. This has sheared a major thread of harmony in their society and hindered the overal economical progress on myanmar.
Although it is true that the more emphasis is always given on the nation as whole, how well they are doing, we have seen many captivating personalities who have grabed the lime light for their nations in the international arena. We have seen Musicians like A.R. Rahman from India, Leader like Sheik Mujibor Rahman from Bangladesh to rise to the international stage and represented the very nature and wealth of the country in that arena. We have seen countries damaged by war like Afganistan to take pride in their national team, which is moral boost for the nation. This helps achievement sometimes helps the nation to stay united.
In colcusion, we can say that how a country is doing is best understood by what is the standard of the life for the mass people. That is the most significant indicator for a great nations. Individual achievement of are of imporatance by they don't convey the full picture of the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them 66
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- TOEFL T P O 12 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TOEFL T P O 43 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'indicate'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: indicate
...erson might stand out but that does not indicates how well a nation is doing. The most co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ondition of human rights are egregious, a intenationally recognised social advoca...
^
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun CEO seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...esh. Furthermore, India has produced so many CEO of several multinational companies, but...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 759, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...n their society and hindered the overal economical progress on myanmar. Although it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 181, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'nation'?
Suggestion: nation
... most significant indicator for a great nations. Individual achievement of are of impor...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hievement of are of imporatance by they dont convey the full picture of the nation. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, look, so, still, well, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2530.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6521617177 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501893939394 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4852752695 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2413793103 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2068965517 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24137931034 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111327681708 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312153992928 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406002096056 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717809271887 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240838719975 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.