Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued by many people that college students should have the freedom to choose courses as per their interest. On the other hand, others believe that courses which are beneficial to students in future should only be included in their study. This essay will discuss both these views and will conclude with why I believe that students should have autonomy in selecting their courses.
First of all, students who study in subjects related to their area of interest can succeed easily. No pressure on studying specific subjects can relax students mind and boost creativity. For example, people who have attained supreme level in arts field had great freedom on opting for this line and were not as good in Math or Science. Moreover, these students can enjoy their coursework and feel passionate about excelling further. They also acquire satisfaction towards their occupation in future. For these reasons, students should be able to study the subjects matching their area of interest.
However, opposite is also often true. Studying subjects like science and technology can provide stability in people’s life. As there are more job opportunities available, there are less chances that they will have to stay unemployed. For instance, one research published in NY Times suggested that students having degree in engineering field have 86% probability of having a job within 3 months of graduation. Thus, for secure future and financial stability it is imperative to study in rewarding fields.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that students should be able to pursue their studies with their area of interest. Although there is somewhat secure future expected by studying in fields like science or match, it still does not guarantee anything without one’s individual efforts and dedication. Students can devote more time and energy more time and energy in the field they like and also feel satisfied selection even if it does not earn them good money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | hueminh | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | D_g_b | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Farhad1010 | 61 | view |
- Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich and poor while others think the opposite is happening Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 57
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 78
- In many countries people are having health problems because they choose to live a unhealthy life. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
- International sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your position 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e satisfaction towards their occupation in future. For these reasons, students should be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... job opportunities available, there are less chances that they will have to stay une...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21835443038 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57865181851 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553797468354 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3912263269 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324261850803 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108206033099 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747646161381 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19851275466 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551759053462 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.