Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations.
Discuss both and give opinion
Approaches to help provision have been a tropical topic. While some contribute directly to local communities that need help, others opt to donate money to charities operating on national or global scale. Both views will be analyzed in the following essay before my personal standpoint is stated.
On one hand, direct provision of help and support to specific areas is compelling for various reasons. Forefront among these is that it is less reliant on money and suited for those financially restricted. A good example of this is that young students and socioeconomic groups in the low-paid income bracket are often seen doing the legwork, serving food to the homeless in an slum. Another justification for preference of on-site support is that it fills people with a sense of fulfillment and pride. In particular, this sensation is shared by those who travel to remote areas to help build houses after a devastating flood, as they get to see their efforts taking physical manifestations and bringing joy to the vulnerable.
On the other hand, charitable organisations are also a credible destination to give money to. To begin with, in modern times, individuals tend to be rather busy, with their work and other ventures, rendering them lack of time or knowledge needed to send help. Through donations, especially of money, they facilitate other better-trained individuals to provide timely and appropriate help to those needed. Also, the increasing number of charities also enables donators to indirectly exert their help to a wider range of people experiencing unfortunate events. For example, instead of focusing on just the poor, charitable contribution could be utilized and distributed to relocate those whose houses are destroyed by floods and tornadoes.
Taking both sets of arguments into consideration, I see that both approaches are legible, depending on individual capacities, in terms of time, money and knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | youjinnyjinnyhong | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | ammaracca | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | nguyen4562 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | nguyenken91 | 56 | view |
- The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minute 78
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumersTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organisations in 2008 and 2014 92
- You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on this task.The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...egwork, serving food to the homeless in an slum. Another justification for prefere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as to, for example, in particular, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33660130719 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99733780522 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0261548363 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249196910178 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754288531191 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624947664283 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127734327958 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389328678441 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.