Smoking should be banned in all public places do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The importance of smoking should be banned in all public places, which was always has now become more controversial with many people calming that it is beneficial while other reject notion the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent year. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views point for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from fact that contains nicotine which causes cancer lung diseases further passive smoker can develop cancer of lung mouth Another pivotal aspect for this argument is that. it may adversely affect fetus during pregnancy. Needless to say that all this merits stand smoking should be banned in all public places in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some merits but one of the crucial effects is that besides…. Hence it is apparent why many are against smoking should be banned in all public places.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of smoking should be banned in all public places is needed instrumental. Nevertheless the potential drawback should not be overlooked either.
- Do you think that place where the person grew has influence on his accomplishment. 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops what is your opinion about this? 84
- Is it better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with thier parents? 77
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while other think it is dangerous and unhealthy which opinion do you agree with? Discus both options & give example 72
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this practice? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... smoker can develop cancer of lung mouth Another pivotal aspect for this argument...
^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...votal aspect for this argument is that. it may adversely affect fetus during pregn...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s but one of the crucial effects is that besides…. Hence it is apparent why many ...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... the crucial effects is that besides…. Hence it is apparent why many are against smo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...l public places is needed instrumental. Nevertheless the potential drawback should not be ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18552036199 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65860882734 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.0595569456 50.4703680194 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363023054864 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150050412928 0.0925447433944 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14073184036 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23338320207 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359689530049 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.