TOP38
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern century, having the power of leadership would be a very useful characteristic for the people. Most of the people think that leadership comes naturally and one cannot learn to be a leader. I agree with this idea too. Let me give you some reasons and examples:
First, I think that every person was born with specific temperament and characteristics. As psychologists say today, a newborn baby's mind is not like a clean whiteboard with no concepts on it. Although people could do a lot of things by only learning how to do them, most of the things have genetic sources. So, most of the characteristics and talents are transferred to a child by genetic cells and they can be improved and developed if they have been learned professionally in the future. In other words, these heredity characteristics could become better and professional in the future by learning new extra things. For instance, If a child has not the talent for leadership, he cannot be a professional leader just by learning the techniques. Whereas, a child who is gifted by the characteristic of leadership, could be a professional leader if he learns extra things to be an expert leader.
Second, leadership is a characteristic which needs high intelligence and cleverness, especially emotional intelligence. People with high emotional intelligence could understand other people's emotions and can have an empathetic behavior across them. This empathetic behavior will direct people to obey this person. In other words, we tend to obey a person who understand our feelings, our issues, our difficulties, and our goals. This kind of talent (empathy toward people) can not be learned. It must be a part of you. Let me give you an example: please consider Gandhi (an Indian leadership. He was so popular among the people, because he was so clever and compassionate, and knew how to treat the people, how understands them, and how express his feelings to them. So, they knew he understands their situation. Because of these features, he was a famous and celebrated leadership for Indian people.
Finally, my idea is closer to the naturalist of leadership power. As I said, the people are earning the talent of leadership by genetic cells and they can improve it by learning the more details and techniques of being a good leader. In addition, a good leader is an empathetic and smart leader. Being empathetic toward people and understanding their feelings and goals is not the stuff earned by just learning. It is genetic.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use spec 75
- Means of transportation 70
- Can advertising tell about the country 73
- should a city preserve or destroy its historic buildings 70
- TPO6 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, whereas, for instance, i think, in addition, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97374701671 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04858761649 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474940334129 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1970618514 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.36 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.76 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204339540983 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654608991292 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681460698998 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155932738926 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800860484736 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.